ModelBrief · Inkling 2 Small · Topic Page
Last updated Nov 13, 2026

Tinker Pricing and Getting-Started Guide: Behind $0.30/$1.00, How the $1.18 per Task Adds Up

Published Nov 13, 2026 · Last updated Nov 13, 2026

Tinker is Thinking Machines Lab's own fine-tuning and inference platform — and the only official route to Inkling 2 Small in its first week. Its price list is short: $0.30 in, $1.00 out. But Artificial Analysis measured $1.18 per task, nearly 6× the predecessor. This article works out three bills: the unit-price comparison, the per-task cost structure, and the free-vs-self-host trade-off. The headline: the unit price is not expensive; the output volume is. To save money, watch the output side — not the host, since every provider charges the same.

Tinker pricing: three meters

Tinker bills three token meters: training, sampling (output) and prefill (input). Inkling 2 Small's prices:

Item (per 1M tokens)PriceNotes
Serverless input (prefill)$0.30Same for 64K and 256K configs
Serverless cached input$0.0390% off on cache hits
Serverless output (sampled)$1.00Includes thinking tokens
Fine-tuning (64K context)$1.50Requires the tml-renderers package
Fine-tuning (256K context)$3.00Long-context fine-tuning costs double

Two caveats: first, serverless inference is currently a waitlist beta, not instant-on; second, Tinker serves only 64K and 256K context configurations — the architecture's 1M limit is not available on Tinker, and needs a local deployment.

Every host charges the same: switching saves nothing

Together AI, Cloudflare Workers AI and OpenRouter all charge $0.30 in / $1.00 out for Inkling 2 Small, exactly matching Tinker; NVIDIA, Fireworks, Baseten, Nebius and Modal have also added it (prices not individually checked). There is no arbitrage on unit price — choose a host on latency, reliability, free allowances and context options, not price. What actually saves money is caching: in Plotly's test about 96% of input tokens came from the provider's cache, and the whole 43-question exam cost $1.81; multi-turn chats and repeated contexts benefit hugely from the $0.03 cached rate.

Where $1.18 per task comes from: output volume

Artificial Analysis's independent measurement: $1.18 and 15.7 minutes per index task; the predecessor Inkling Small measured $0.20 and 7.0 minutes. Breaking it down: the $0.30 input price is only slightly above the $0.24 class median — AA called it "somewhat expensive," but it is not the main driver. The main driver is output volume: about 150K output tokens per task, 4× the predecessor's ~37K. At $1.00 per 1M tokens, 150K output tokens is $0.15, and multi-turn tool calls add input and thinking tokens on top. AA's words were "notably slow per task and very verbose" — slowness and verbosity are two sides of the same coin.

But note: $1.18 is the AA index-task figure (long-horizon, high effort), not a universal per-task cost. thoughtfullab's finance-diligence test produced a full memo for $0.69; Plotly's whole 43-question data-analysis exam cost $1.81. Different tasks differ by an order of magnitude — treating $1.18 as a general cost is wrong; treating it as an upper reference for long, high-effort tasks is right.

Free variants: try it without paying

OpenCode's inkling-2-small-free is free for a limited time, and OpenRouter has a free variant (co-founder Soumith Chintala described it as "free in exchange for data use"). Free entry points suit three things: checking whether the model fits your task, comparing its output quality with your current model, and running small-scale tests. Note "limited time" — free allowances can change at any time, so don't put production traffic on a free variant.

Self-hosting: free weights, not-free hardware

The weights are $0 (Apache 2.0), but the NVFP4 checkpoint needs at least 500GB of aggregated VRAM (2× B300 or 4× H200) and MXFP8 needs 800GB. Rent or buy depends on volume: at low volume, hosted APIs are cheaper (even $1.18 per task does not add up to much); at high volume, long context and high concurrency, self-hosting has lower marginal cost — but factor in hardware depreciation, operations and power. Plotly notes the 4-bit weights need about 356GB of memory, "which fits on one 512 GB Mac Studio" — that is the weight files' footprint; the official 500GB figure presumably includes runtime overhead, so plan against the official number.

Money-saving checklist

Five directly usable tips: first, use caching — repeated contexts and multi-turn chats should hit the $0.03 cached input rate; second, cap output length — output tokens are the bill's biggest part, keep them short; third, lower the effort level — xhigh scores look good but burn tokens fast, and everyday tasks don't need it; fourth, validate task fit on the free variants before paying; fifth, confirm context needs first — Tinker only serves 64K/256K, so 1M needs a local deployment, don't force it on Tinker.

Our take: Tinker's pricing is transparent; the real cost variable is the model's behavior: 150K output tokens, 15.7 minutes per task. The $0.30/$1.00 unit price is identical across hosts, so selection is not about price comparison — it is about task fit: whether your task is one of its strengths (vision, finance, data analysis) and whether you accept its speed and verbosity. Test on the free variants, run production on hosted APIs, and consider self-hosting only at high volume.

Reference source: this article is an original rewrite produced by this site; facts and figures were checked against kie.ai's Inkling 2 Small specs, costs & benchmarks (around Nov 6, 2026)

← Back to the Inkling 2 Small topic page